Hieb v. State
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KAPSNER, Justice.
[¶ 1] David Hieb appeals from a district court order denying his application for post-conviction relief. Hieb argues his conviction should be reversed because he pled guilty to conspiracy to commit felony murder which is not a cognizable offense. We affirm, concluding Hieb’s application is untimely.
I
[¶ 2] In 2005, Hieb was charged with conspiracy to commit murder in violation of N.D.C.C. §§ 12.1-06-04 and 12.1-16-01. The information was amended to include an additional charge of murder in violation of N.D.C.C. § 12.1-16-01(l)(c). The information was amended a second time to *725di…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Datz v. DoschNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. RufusNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. BornerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- In Re: Clarence Edward HillCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
- Lave v. DretkeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bridges v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
- Bridges v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
- Quamme v. QuammeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
- Hieb v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- Moncada v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022