Legal Opinion

Hieb v. State

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 2016No. 20160019PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] David Hieb appeals from a district court order denying his application for post-conviction relief. Hieb argues his conviction should be reversed because he pled guilty to conspiracy to commit felony murder which is not a cognizable offense. We affirm, concluding Hieb’s application is untimely.

I

[¶ 2] In 2005, Hieb was charged with conspiracy to commit murder in violation of N.D.C.C. §§ 12.1-06-04 and 12.1-16-01. The information was amended to include an additional charge of murder in violation of N.D.C.C. § 12.1-16-01(l)(c). The information was amended a second time to *725di…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Datz v. DoschNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State v. RufusNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  3. State v. BornerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  4. In Re: Clarence Edward HillCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
  5. Lave v. DretkeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bridges v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  2. Bridges v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  3. Quamme v. QuammeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  4. Hieb v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Moncada v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API