Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Reinecke

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided July 27, 1990No. COMR No. 90A-05Published

1Concurrence

RIVES, Judge,

with whom

McLAUTHLIN, Judge joins, concurring.

While I agree that the military judge incorrectly decided that the accused was denied a speedy trial, I write separately to express disagreement with one aspect of the lead opinion.

It is clear that the military judge erred as a matter of law by the manner in which he purported to abate the proceedings. Even though the government had never indicated it would refuse to comply with a judicial order to hire the expert, the judge nonetheless “abated” the proceedings at the same time he granted the defense request for the expert. This…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. BraggU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API