Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Worrell v. Peelle

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 1889No. 14,978PublishedCited by 14 opinions

From the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtOlds, J.

— The relator filed his information to obtain possession of the office of chief of the “Indiana Bureau of Statistics,” to which office he claimed to have been duly appointed by the Governor of the State, and for the removal of the defendant, William A. Peelle, Jr., who it is alleged had usurped and illegally continued to hold such office.

*497The defendant demurred to the information in the court below, stating two causes of demurrer:

“First. That the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.
“Second. That the plaintiff has not legal capacity to sue.”

The court…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Evansville v. State ex rel. BlendIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. State ex rel. Jameson v. DennyIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. State ex rel. Holt v. DennyIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Newland v. MarshIllinois Supreme Court · 1857
  5. Bigelow v. West Wisconsin Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1871

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Tucker v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1941
  2. State ex rel. Worrell v. CarrIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Shuck v. State ex rel. CopeIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  4. State ex rel. Collett v. GorbyIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. State ex rel. Dithmar v. BunnellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API