Legal Opinion
Holm v. Ithaca College
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 27, 1998PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Walter J. Relihan, Jr., J.
The defendant College moves for summary judgment dismissing the complaint in its entirety. On an earlier motion, we dismissed the complaint against the College officers, as individuals. We also held that the College is not a “State actor” (Klinge v Ithaca Coll., 167 Misc 2d 458, 461, mod on other grounds 235 AD2d 724; see also, Moghimzadeh v College of St. Rose, 236 AD2d 681). In consequence, plaintiff now withdraws the ninth cause of action asserting constitutional and related statutory claims.
I. FACTS
The College administration promulgated a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v. Long Island Rail RoadNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- NBT Bancorp Inc. v. Fleet/Norstar Financial Group, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Rowe v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Stukuls v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Gertler v. GoodgoldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Pearson v. Walden UniversityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015