National Labor Relations Board v. Curwood Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.
An employer who learns its employees are contemplating unionization need not remain silent. It must proceed with caution, however, lest it violate the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”). In this case, Curwood, Inc. attempted to counter a union campaign in part by promising improvements in pension benefits to employees in the voting unit. It also announced benefits to a small group of employees that were excluded from the unit. The National Labor Relations Board (“Board”) ruled that these actions constituted several unfair labor practices, and the Board now seeks to…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Sure-Tan, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- National Labor Relations Board v. Exchange Parts Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- National Labor Relations Board v. Mexia Textile Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- National Labor Relations Board v. Raytheon Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- National Labor Relations Board v. Curwood IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005