Legal Opinion
Wilder v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided August 18, 2004No. 71A03-0307-CR-284PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MAY, Judge.
Jason Wilder appeals the denial of his motion to correct error. Wilder raises one issue on appeal, which we restate as whether his rights under the Sixth 1 and Fourteenth 2 Amendments to the United States Constitution were violated because his jury venire included only one African-American.
We affirm in part and vacate in part.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Wilder was invited to join a plan to steal crack cocaine from Ronald Robinson ("Robinson"). The other participants were Shawndel Gordon ("Shawndel"), Ronald Smith ("Smith") and Tecory Gordon ("Cory"). The idea came about when…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Duren v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Daniels v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
- Taylor v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
- Dye v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Bond v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- Laux v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
- Morrison v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Wells v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Davis v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.