Legal Opinion

Gauntt v. Chehalis County

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1913No. 10807PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Chehalis county, Sheeks, J., entered March SO, 1912, upon granting a nonsuit, dismissing an action on contract.

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

This is an action on a contract, to recover money alleged to be owing, due, and unpaid. On November IS, 1906, Gauntt, the appellant, entered into a written contract with the respondent, the board of county commissioners of Chehalis county. Under this contract the appellant was to prepare plans and specifications for a courthouse building, to be erected at Montesano, Washington, and deliver them to the respondent on December S, 1906. On or prior to this date, the plans and specifications were prepared and delivered as required by the contract. At the time of their delivery, the respondent paid…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Farley v. LettermanWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Furst v. Board of EducationAppellate Court of Illinois · 1959
  3. Wyatt C. Hedrick, Inc. v. RatcliffCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API