Legal Opinion

Schiller v. Hardenburg

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided January 15, 1907PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by the defendants from a judgment of the Municipal Court, of the city of New York, first district, borough of Manhattan, rendered in favor of the plaintiff.

1Opinion of the CourtGildersleeve, J.

A summons in this action was issued on June 4, 1906, returnable June 12, 1906, and was returned with "proof of personal service upon the defendant Ilardenburg at Centre street in this city. The summons was issued out of and returnable to the First District Court, borough of Manhattan. Upon the return day, the defendant Ilardenburg appeared and filed an affidavit setting forth that the defendant resided in the borough of Brooklyn, seventh district, and that the plaintiff also resided in Brooklyn and asked that the cause be removed from said first district to the seventh district of Brooklyn…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Risley v. . Phenix Bank of City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. McMahon v. . RauhrNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  3. Catlin v. RundellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Universal Cutter Co. v. EmdenAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1907
  2. Evers v. GouldAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API