Chemical Realty Corp. v. Home Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Hollywood
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
I
Home Federal’s argument that this action should have been dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is without merit. Original civil jurisdiction “is vested in the aggregate in the superior court division and the district court division as the trial divisions of the General Court of Justice.” G.S. 7A-240. And where the amount in controversy exceeds $5,000, the superior court is the proper division for the trial. G.S. 7A-243. This action was brought appropriately in superior court.
II
Home Federal argues that none of the circumstances which would give the North Carolina…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Byham v. National Cibo House CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Goldman v. Parkland of Dallas, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- Whitaker v. EarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Bailey v. McPhersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Phoenix America Corp. v. BrisseyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Thomas v. Overland Express, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
- Chemical Realty Corp. v. Home Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of HollywoodCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- General Time Corp. v. Eye Encounter, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. CanipeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983