Legal Opinion

GRANNEMANN v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 20, 2012No. 5D10-4299PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJacobus, J.

Dean William Grannemann’s probation was revoked based on his failure to complete a drug treatment program and his failure to report to his probation officer as instructed. However, the only evidence supporting his failure to complete drug treatment was hearsay testimony indieat- ing that his probation officer had been told by the treating facility that he had been unsuccessfully discharged from its program. Such evidence is insufficient in itself to support a finding of a violation of probation. See Davis v. State, 831 So.2d 792, 793 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002). Further, the State failed to offer any…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Curry v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  2. Rubio v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  3. Davis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  4. Orr v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Warner v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  2. ISAIAH JOE BEAN v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API