Legal Opinion

Djalma S. Wolfson v. Morris Blumberg

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 6, 1965No. 239, Docket 29135PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff brought suit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, alleging three “causes of action” against defendant. There was no diversity of citizenship between the parties. Upon motion of the defendant, Judge Metzner dismissed the second and third causes, on the ground that they did not arise under federal law, and that they were not pendent to the first cause, which did arise under federal law. The opinion is reported at 229 F.Supp. 191. Upon reargument, Judge Metzner adhered to his original determination, and also tacitly denied plaintiff’s request…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wolfson v. BlumbergDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1964

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Richardson Greenshields Securities, Inc. v. Mui-Hin Lau, Ho Sih Fong, Kau-Ying Lau, Ying Lup Lau, and Wai Yau ChiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  2. Gumer v. Shearson, Hammill & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  3. Coy E. Kirtland v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., Columbia Gulf Transmission CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  4. Cramer v. General Telephone & Electronics Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
  5. Max S. Gumer v. Shearson, Hammill & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API