Legal Opinion

Temple v. Dull

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 13, 1982No. B2953PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAM ROBERTSON, Justice.

Gaston Temple, one of three individuals and two corporate defendants in the court below, brings this appeal from a judgment in favor of appellee for $33,500.00 plus attorney fees and interest, the amount found by the jury to have been due under a contract to pay a real estate commission. We affirm.

In his only point of error, appellant contends “[tjhere is no evidence that Defendant, Gaston Temple, executed a contract enforceable under Art. 6573(a), Tex.Rev. Civ.Stat.Ann.” Even assuming this point directs our attention to the error relied on, pursuant to Tex.R.Civ.P.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hodges v. NixCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  2. Fenton v. WadeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  3. Red River Cattle Co. v. SullySupreme Court of the United States · 1892

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Monk v. Dallas Brake & Clutch Service Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1985
  2. Russell v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
  3. Howard P. Foley Co. v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984
  4. Stocking v. Biery, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1984
  5. Haddock v. Arnspiger, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API