Legal Opinion

State v. Tribble

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided December 30, 2005No. 03-073PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSkoglund, J.

¶ 1. Defendant challenges his conviction for first-degree murder following a jury trial, claiming that the trial court erred by (1) finding defendant competent to stand trial, (2) permitting defendant’s attorney to withdraw before jury selection, (3) allowing the trial to proceed in the absence of defendant, and (4) granting the State’s objections to the presentence investigation report. We reverse.

¶ 2. This case presents the unusual circumstance of a criminal trial of an unrepresented defendant who chose not to attend his trial — in other words, a trial with nobody sitting at the defense…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Godinez v. MoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. United States v. Paul FazziniCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. YohSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
  3. State v. BrillonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
  4. In Re CombsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
  5. State v. MumleySupreme Court of Vermont · 2009

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API