Legal Opinion · Dissent

Paine v. Beek's Pizza

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 31, 1982No. 82-172Published

1DissentTodd, Justice

I must respectfully dissent. The majority opinion is a comprehensive, excellent factual analysis of the record. However, because it is a factual matter, we are departing from our longstanding rule of not substituting our view of the facts for that of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals. This is not a case of a factual error such as occurred in Turay v. Allied Enterprises, Inc., 256 N.W.2d 71 (Minn.1977). There we reversed a decision awarding compensation for injury to a right knee where the record disclosed medical treatment to the left knee. Here, as the majority opinion candidly…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Turay v. Allied Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API