Legal Opinion

Cuyamel Fruit Co. v. Johnson Iron Works, Ltd.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 6, 1920No. 3410PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Louisiana; Rufus E. Foster, Judge. Action at law by the Cuyamel Fruit Company against the Johnson Iron Works, Limited. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

GRUBB, District Judge.

This is a writ of error to a judgment of the District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, in an action at law for damages by the plaintiff in error against the defendant in error, and in which the defendant in error filed a reconventional demand. Judgment was for the defendant upon the original cause of action, and also in its favor on the reconvention. The action and cross-action were based upon a contract by which the defendant in error agreed to make certain repairs on the steamship Omoa at the instance of the plaintiff in error. The contract was evidenced by…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hawkhurst S. S. Co. v. KeyserDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 1897

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. George C. Peterson Co. v. County of IowaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Fritz-Rumer-Cooke Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960
  3. Curtis Elev. Co., Inc. v. Hampshire HouseNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  4. Cotton Concentration Co. v. A. Lassberg & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API