Legal Opinion
Azurak v. Corporate Property Investors
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided January 23, 2003PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Per curiam
In 1994, Planned Building Services (PBS), a janitorial company, entered into a contract with Corporate Property Investors (the Mall) that contained the following provision:
Contractor [PBS] shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless each Indemnitee [the Mall] from and against any claim (including any claim brought by employees of Contractor), liability, damage or expense (including attorneys’ fees) that such Indemnitee may incur relating to, arising out of or existing by reason of (i) Contractor’s performance of this Agreement or the conditions created thereby (including the use, misuse or…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ramos v. Browning Ferris Industries of South Jersey, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
- Mantilla v. NC Mall AssociatesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
- Doloughty v. Blanchard Const. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
- Azurak v. Corporate Prop. InvestorsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
3Cited by20 opinions
- Celanese Ltd. v. Essex County Imp. Auth.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
- Englert v. the Home DepotNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2006
- Hertz Corp. v. Zurich American InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2007
- Martinez-Santiago v. Public StorageDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2014
- Nagim v. New Jersey TransitNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.