Legal Opinion

Harris v. Dyer

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 7, 1981No. 78-1378-E-3, CA 17650PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, J.

The sole issue in this action to foreclose a construction lien is whether either party is entitled to costs and statutorily authorized attorney fees. ORS 87.060(4). 1 The question arises because after the foreclosure proceeding was commenced, it was abated on defendant’s motion pending arbitration of the dispute pursuant to ORS 33.240 2 and the contract between the parties, and after the arbitration award was filed with the circuit court (ORS 33.310), 3 the action was dismissed on defendant’s motion after the amount of the award was tendered to plaintiff.

From the judgment dismissing the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Colby v. LarsonOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Jackson v. Penny Duquette Knits, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1976

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. CVN Group, Inc. v. DelgadoTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Harris v. DyerOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Buckminster v. Acadia Village Resort, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
  4. P & C Construction Co. v. American Diversified/Wells Park IICourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  5. CVN Group, Inc. v. DelgadoTexas Supreme Court · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API