Legal Opinion

Eiche v. Blankenau

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1997No. S-96-132PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, C.J.

This is an appeal' from an order of the district court for Douglas County, which sustained the motion for summary judgment of the defendants-appellees, Edmund H. Blankenau and Mark Blankenau; denied the motion for summary judgment of the plaintiffs-appellants, Stuart B. Eiche and Douglas S. Eiche; and dismissed the appellants’ second amended petition.

*256Summary judgment is proper only when the pleadings, depositions, admissions, stipulations, and affidavits in the record disclose that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact or as to the ultimate inferences that may be drawn from those…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Van Pelt v. GreathouseNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  2. MacAffer v. Boston & Maine RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  3. Moulton v. BOARD OF ZONING APP., LINCOLNNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Polinski v. Omaha Public Power DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  5. TERRY D. WHITTEN, DDS, PC v. MalcolmNebraska Supreme Court · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Barnett v. PetersNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Vowers & Sons, Inc. v. StrasheimNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Chalupa v. ChalupaNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Midwest Renewable Energy v. American Engr. TestingNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Herman Bros., Inc. v. Great West Cas. Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API