Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Lomas Mortgage U.S.A. (In re Hamilton)

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided May 22, 1989No. Nos. 89 C 257, 88 B 9923PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

BUA, District Judge.

Appellants/cross-appellees Arthur and Janet Hamilton (“the Hamiltons”) filed a Chapter 13 bankruptcy petition on June 28, 1988. On November 10, 1988, Bankruptcy Judge Susan Pierson DeWitt issued an order modifying the automatic stay which had taken effect at the filing of the Hamil-tons’ petition. Judge DeWitt issued the order in response to the “Motion to Modify Automatic Stay or Dismiss Petition” filed by appellee/cross-appellant Lomas Mortgage U.S.A. (“Lomas”), one of the Hamil-tons’ creditors. The order denied Lomas’ motion to the extent that it sought dismissal…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ukrainian Savings and Loan Ass'n v. Trident Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Smith v. Cooley (In Re Cooley)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pacana v. Pacana-Siler (In Re Pacana)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  2. Pacana v. Pacana-Siler (In Re Pacana)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API