Day v. Beyer

This is defendant’s rule for a new trial based on two reasons —(1) that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence and (2) that the court improperly refused to admit in evidence two photographs offered by the defendant.

We think neither ground sufficient to justify disturbing the verdict. The action grew out of a collision between a motorcycle, on which the plaintiff was riding, and an automobile of the defendant. The evidence showed that the plaintiff was proceeding on his motorcycle west on South Orange avenue, in South Orange, and the defendant proceeding east with his automobile on…