Legal Opinion

In re Abrahams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 29, 2003PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

The respondent was served with a petition and a supplemental petition containing 19 charges of professional misconduct. Charges 9 and 13 were subsequently amended. In his answer and amended answer to the petition, the respondent generally denied that he was guilty of misconduct. In his supplemental answer, he admitted all of the factual allegations contained in Charges 15 through 19 and asserted several affirmative defenses. At the hearing, the petitioner’s case consisted entirely of documentary evidence, to wit, 28 exhibits. The respondent testified on his own behalf and…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Caiola v. Allcity InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Abrahams v. Appellate Division of the Supreme CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
  2. In re GluckDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API