Legal Opinion

Cooper v. Haines

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 1, 1889PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the Orphans’ Court of Cecil County. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

The sole question in this case is, whether the will of Mary R. Haines, is a valid execution of the power given her in the will of George Haines her husband ? The testatrix died in 1881, and her will does not therefore come within the operation of the Act of 1888, ch. 249, which provides that, “every devise and bequest, purporting to be of all real and personal property belonging to the testator, shall be construed to include *284also all property over which lie lias a general power of appointment, unless the contrary intention shall appear in the will or co dicil containing such devise or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Balls v. DampmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1888
  2. Mory v. MichaelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1862
  3. Patterson v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1885

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lane v. LaneSupreme Court of Delaware · 1903
  2. Reeside v. Annex Building Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
  3. Mines v. GambrillCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1889
  4. Bullerdick v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Moran v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API