Tuttle v. Matthews
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York
Motion by the Defendant for an Injunction.
1Opinion of the CourtCoxe, J.
The complainants are the owners, for the state of New York, of reissued letters patent No. 9,148, dated April 13, 1880, issued to David L. Garver for an improvement in harrows. An interlocutory decree was entered on the eighteenth of May, 1886, and the complainants proceeded to an accounting. While the hearing was pending before the master, the defendant ascertained that the complainants’ agents, by means of threatened litigation, had collected, or were attempting to collect, money from the users of the infringing harrows for which defendant has accounted in this action. No final decree has…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Birdsell v. ShaliolSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
3Cited by8 opinions
- Asbestos Shingle, Slate & Sheathing Co. v. H. W. Johns-Manville Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1911
- Philadelphia Trust, Safe-Deposit & Insurance v. Edison Electric Light Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1895
- De Laski & Thropp Circular Woven Tire Co. v. Empire Rubber & Tire Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1916
- Rollman Mfg. Co. v. Universal Hardware WorksDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1916
- United States Printing Co. v. American Playing-Card Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Michigan · 1895
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.