Legal Opinion
Vanaman v. Palmer
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided January 30, 1986PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHANDLER, Judge.
Plaintiff Paul Vanaman instituted this lawsuit on November 25, 1985, asserting violations of his constitutional rights under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution and seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendant Jerome F. Palmer, a member of the Georgetown Delaware Police Department at the time of the incident complained of, has moved to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it is barred by the applicable two-year statute of limitations, 10 Del.C. § 8119. Having reviewed the submissions of the parties, this is the Court’s decision on the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Gardner v. Toilet Goods Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Charles A. L. Almond v. John E. Kent, Sheriff of Augusta County, VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972
- Gordenstein v. University of DelawareDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1974
- Trivits v. Wilmington InstituteDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Carr v. Town of Dewey BeachDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1990
- Felder v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Felder v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Sands v. Delaware Department of CorrectionSuperior Court of Delaware · 2017