Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Caillier

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 24, 1993PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 21, 1992, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he refused employment without good cause.

A representative from Allwash of Syracuse, Inc. testified that on September 26 or 27, 1991 he called claimant on the telephone and offered him a job as an asbestos handler commencing October 1, 1991. The representative further testified that claimant, who had worked for Allwash earlier that year in the same capacity but at a lower rate of pay, refused the offer of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of SmertenkoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  2. In re the Claim of WeisbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of PalmerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. In re the Claim of BahrAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. In re the Claim of DesmariasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. In re the Claim of HerreraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  5. In re the Claim of PigottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API