Hakim v. Accenture United States Pension Plan
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ROBERT M. DOW, JR., District Judge.
Before the Court are Defendant’s bill of costs [202], Defendant’s motion for leave to file instanter reply brief in support of bill of costs [213], and Defendant’s motion for attorneys’ fees [216]. For the reasons set forth below, the Court denies Defendant’s motion for attorneys’ fees [216], but awards Defendant costs in the amount of $1,969.97. The Court also grants Defendant’s motion for leave to file instanter reply brief in support of its bill of costs [213],
I. Background
In its September 29, 2011 opinion, the Court granted…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Webster v. FallSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Hecker v. Deere & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Farmer v. Arabian American Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Aviall Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Montanez v. Chicago Police Officers FicoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
- Pennsylvania Chiropractic Ass'n v. Blue Cross Blue Shield Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014
- Manley v. Boat/U.S., Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019
- Midwest Fence Corporation v. United States Department of TransportationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
- Neita v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023