Legal Opinion

Hakim v. Accenture United States Pension Plan

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided October 3, 2012No. Case No. 08-cv-3682PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ROBERT M. DOW, JR., District Judge.

Before the Court are Defendant’s bill of costs [202], Defendant’s motion for leave to file instanter reply brief in support of bill of costs [213], and Defendant’s motion for attorneys’ fees [216]. For the reasons set forth below, the Court denies Defendant’s motion for attorneys’ fees [216], but awards Defendant costs in the amount of $1,969.97. The Court also grants Defendant’s motion for leave to file instanter reply brief in support of its bill of costs [213],

I. Background

In its September 29, 2011 opinion, the Court granted…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Webster v. FallSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Hecker v. Deere & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  4. Farmer v. Arabian American Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Aviall Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Montanez v. Chicago Police Officers FicoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
  2. Pennsylvania Chiropractic Ass'n v. Blue Cross Blue Shield Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014
  3. Manley v. Boat/U.S., Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019
  4. Midwest Fence Corporation v. United States Department of TransportationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
  5. Neita v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API