Legal Opinion
Saintal-Bowman v. Barashy
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided July 26, 2021No. 2:21-cv-01271Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 PRISCELLA SAINTAL-BOWMAN et al., 6 Case No. 2:21-cv-01271-GMN-NJK Plaintiffs, 7 ORDER v. 8 [Docket Nos. 4, 5] NATAN SHAWN BARASHY, et al., 9 Defendants. 10 11 Plaintiffs are proceeding in this action pro se and have requested authority under 28 U.S.C. 12 § 1915 to proceed in forma pauperis. Docket Nos. 4, 5. Plaintiffs also submitted a complaint to 13 initiate this case in this Court. Docket No. 1-1. 14 I. In Forma Pauperis Applications 15 Plaintiffs have submitted the affidavits required by § 1915(a). Docket Nos. 4, 5. Plaintiffs 16…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Rivet v. Regions Bank of LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Rasul v. BushSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- In re Pegasus Gold Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.