Legal Opinion

In re Worthington

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided March 21, 2014No. 13-7740-RLM-13Published

1Opinion of the Court

Order Overruling Trustee’s Objection to Amended Chapter 13 Plan for Failure to Offer All Social Security Income

ROBYN L. MOBERLY, Bankruptcy Judge.

The Trustee raised several objections to the Debtor’s First Amended Chapter 13 Plan, all of which hinge upon the treatment of Debtor’s social security income and whether the failure to include all of Debtor’s social security income in Debtor’s plan payments is bad faith. For the reasons stated herein, the Court finds that the Debtor is not obligated to devote all of his social security income to the Plan and the failure to do so is not bad faith.

Back…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. D. Ginsberg & Sons, Inc. v. PopkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. United States v. ChaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Baud v. CarrollCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
  4. In Re: DAVID C. WELSH and SHARON N. WELSHCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  5. S. Beaulieu, Jr. v. Benjamin RagosCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API