Legal Opinion

Lee v. . Eure

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 5, 1885PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Bankruptcy— Counter-claim — Parties—Judgment Liens Against Land, of Deceased Debtor. This was a PROCEEDING to enforce a judgment lien, heard before Gudger, Judge, at. Spring Term, 1884, of Gates Superior Court. There was judgment for the plaintiff, from which the defendants, M. H. Eure, B. L. Sanders and John R. Jones appealed. The facts are fully stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, C. J.

This action is prosecuted under the provisions contained in sections 318 to 324 inclusive, of C. C. P., by the plaintiff, as assignee of a judgment recovered in the Superior Court of Gates at Fall Term, 1867, by certain infant creditors of William H. Lee, upon which execution issued and was levied on lands of the debtor; and its object, the debtor having since died intestate, is to enforce the lien against his heirs-at-law to whom the lands thus charged have descended. Previous to the rendition of the judgment the intestate debtor executed a deed, dated in September, 1867, to Mills H. Eure…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Phillips Walsh v. . Rufus D. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1872
  2. Murchison v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
  3. Bitting v. . ThaxtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
  4. Bevers v. . ParkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  5. Mauney v. . HolmesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Newsome v. . HarrellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  2. Egerton v. . JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  3. Jones, Lee & Co. v. BrittonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  4. Smith v. French.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API