Legal Opinion
Martin v. Ebert
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided March 17, 1944PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.
After stating the residence and business of the parties and setting forth that the plaintiff was employed by one Anton 'Wendling to do work upon the premises owned by Leo W. Lukoski, ■ which operations it is alleged the defendants had determined to halt by any fair or foul means, plaintiff in his complaint alleges :
“(9) Plaintiff is informed and verily believes and, upon such information and belief alleges the fact to be, that the defendants herein, on or about the 28th day of October, 1939, formed a conspiracy to prevent any further progress looking toward the completion of said job at 7208…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gatzow v. BueningWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
- Martens v. ReillyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
- Jones v. MonsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
- Judevine v. Benzies-Montanye Fuel & Warehouse Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
- Du Cate v. Town of BrightonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Blankenship v. BoyleDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1971
- Coopman v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
- Liappas v. AugoustisSupreme Court of Florida · 1950
- Wilson & Co. v. United Packinghouse Wkrs. of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1960
- Lloyd v. LoefflerDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.