Legal Opinion

United States v. Dharamdeo Babwah and Deodath Maharaj

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided August 6, 1992No. 1557, 1775, Docket 92-1055, 92-1056Published

1Opinion of the Court

972 F.2d 30

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,

v.

Dharamdeo BABWAH and Deodath Maharaj, Defendants-Appellants.

Nos. 1557, 1775, Docket Nos. 92-1055, 92-1056.

United States Court of Appeals,

Second Circuit.

Argued May 19, 1992.

Decided Aug. 6, 1992.

Solomon H. Kaplan, Bronx, N.Y. (Stuart N. Kaplan, of counsel), for defendant-appellant Babwah.

Stanley M. Meyer, New York City (DePetris & Meyer, of counsel), for defendant-appellant Maharaj.

Ilene B. Weininger, Asst. U.S. Atty., Brooklyn, N.Y. (Andrew J. Maloney, U.S. Atty. E.D.N.Y., Susan Corkery, Asst. U.S. Atty., of counsel), for appellee.

Before:…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API