Legal Opinion
Hall v. Progress Pig, Inc.
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided May 12, 2000No. S-98-1190PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.
NATURE OF CASE
Norma L. Hall, David L. Hansen, Everett Holstein, and John K. Hansen (collectively referred to as “the plaintiffs”) brought this action alleging that Progress Pig, Inc., is a nonfamily farm corporation owning land used in farming, in violation of article XII, § 8, of the Nebraska Constitution. The district court held that Progress Pig was in violation of article XII, § 8. Progress Pig has appealed, and the plaintiffs have cross-appealed.
SCOPE OF REVIEW
Constitutional interpretation is a question of law on which the Nebraska Supreme Court is obligated to reach a conclusion…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- City of New Orleans v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Police Dept. of Chicago v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. LynchNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
- Woodward v. AndersenNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
- Pony Lake School District 30 v. State Committee for Reorganization of School DistrictsNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
- State Ex Rel. Lemon v. GaleNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
- Staley v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.