Legal Opinion

Newell v. Moore

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 22, 2002No. 1D99-4569PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, C.J.

This proceeding is before us upon a motion for review pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.400(c), by which the appellant challenges a trial court order denying a Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.400(a) motion for costs relating to his earlier appeal. In that appeal this court determined that the appellant had made a facially sufficient claim under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540(b), and this court reversed the trial court’s denial of that motion. See Newell v. Moore, 789 So.2d 538 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). In thereafter denying the rule 9.400(a) costs motion the trial…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Florida Power & Light Co. v. PolackwichDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  2. Stringer v. KatzellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  3. Newell v. MooreDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  4. Fleitman v. McPhersonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Osterback v. TurnerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  2. Kandyce McPherson v. Killyah SamuelDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API