Legal Opinion

State v. Vanover

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 19, 1997No. 95-1688PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAVORATO, Justice.

A jury convicted the defendant, Obeli Van-over, of conspiracy to deliver a controlléd substance and possession of a controlled substance. His appeal presents the classic clash between a criminal defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to counsel of defendant’s choice and a trial court’s need to maintain the highest ethical standards of professional responsibility in the courtroom. The issue is whether the district court abused its discretion when it disqualified Vanover’s counsel because the State intended to call counsel as a witness to testify about a statement counsel took from…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Wheat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. United States v. Frank Locascio, and John GottiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  4. Roy Wilson v. Barry MintzesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
  5. United States v. Dolan, John E.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. State v. MagheeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997
  2. State v. AtleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1997
  3. State v. WatsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
  4. State of Iowa v. Lavelle Lonelle McKinleySupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
  5. Mohammed v. OtoadeseSupreme Court of Iowa · 2007

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API