Legal Opinion

Luke v. Luke

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 1, 1925No. 16026Published

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

1. The return to and filing in the court in which the main suit was instituted of the certified affidavit and bond for garnishment by the officer serving it, together with his return of service upon the garnishee thereon, as required under section 5278 of the Civil Code (1910), is sufficient to show the pendency of the garnishment proceedings in the county of the garnishee’s residence. See, in this connection, Atlanta & West Point R. Co. v. Farmers’ Exchange, 6 Ga. App. 405 (65 S. E. 165) ; Carr & Co. v. Roney, 118 Ga. 634 (45 S. E. 464).

2. An entry upon a bond given in a judicial proceeding,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Carr & Co. v. RoneySupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Atlanta & West Point Railroad v. Farmers' ExchangeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API