Legal Opinion

Farnsley's Administrator v. Philadelphia Life Insurance

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 8, 1914PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from McCracken Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Hannah

Reversing.

TMs action was instituted on what is usually termed an accident insurance policy, insuring Frank _R. Farnsley against ‘‘accidental death (suicide, sane or insane not covered) * * * for loss of life, seven hundred dollars. ’ ’

The petition after setting out plaintiff’s capacity to sue, and its appointment as administrator of the estate of Frank R. Farnsley, is as follows:

“Plaintiff says that on the 4th day of December, 1912, the defendant, the Philadelphia Life Insurance Company, a corporation of Philadelphia, PaM> engaged in the life and accident…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Aetna Life Insurance v. KaiserCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
  2. Masonic Life Ass'n v. Pollard's Gd'nCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1905

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sanders v. Commonwealth Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  2. Carey-Reed Co. v. SiscoCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  3. Powers v. HardestyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API