Legal Opinion

Whittington v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 19, 1995No. 94-1741PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BENTON, Judge.

Convicted of shooting into a building and of aggravated assault with a firearm, Richard Whittington appeals, claiming that the trial court erred in ruling that he would be “testifying,” and so subject to impeachment, if he displayed his tattoos to the jury. We conclude that a new trial is necessary unless, on remand, he fails to establish that he had the tattoos at the time of the shooting.

Evidence at trial established that appellant was one of three young men who appeared uninvited at the victim’s house. She testified that it was Whittington who pointed a gun at her; and that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. Walter T. BestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  2. United States v. John Bacall, United States of America v. John Bacall Imports, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  3. United States v. ValdiviaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  4. United States v. Thaeeb BayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  5. MacIas v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  2. Miller v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  3. Amended July 16, 2014 State of Iowa v. Jassimen N. DobbinsCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2014
  4. Rosario v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  5. Rosario v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API