Legal Opinion

Daugherty v. Rester

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 25, 1994No. 1921461PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This case involves an interpretation of a provision in a redemption statute relating to the time when an owner can redeem property that has been sold for nonpayment of taxes.

The specific issue is whether the phrase "three years from the date of the sale" in the redemption statute means three years from the date of the issuance of the tax deed or means three years from the date of the issuance of the certificate ofpurchase, when the property was actually sold for nonpayment of taxes.

The trial court held that the original owners could redeem under the provisions of §§ 40-10-120 and 40-10-122,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. O'CONNOR v. RabrenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  2. Pugh v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  3. Van Meter v. GriceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  4. Edmonson v. ColwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  5. Heard v. GunnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re FerrouillatUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Alabama · 2016
  2. Washington v. Orix Credit Alliance, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2001
  3. Daugherty v. ResterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  4. In re FerrouillatUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Alabama · 2016
  5. In re: Howard Ross v. Deborah Whitfield, as personal representative of the Estate of Gary T. WhitfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API