Legal Opinion

In re Wolfe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1924PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Crouch, J.:

Upon the reargument we have considered this case in the light of additional evidence stipulated by the attorneys for the respective parties, not contained in the original record, showing that all the brothers and sisters of testatrix predeceased Roy D. Herrick. We are of opinion that this additional fact does not affect the decision as originally made. (See Matter of Turner, 206 App. Div. 294; 207 id. 837.) It is urged that under the construction of the will there made, no estate or interest did or could vest in the brothers and sisters of testatrix until the death of either or…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hennessy v. . PattersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Sage v. WheelerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  3. In re WolfeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
  4. In re the Final Judicial Settlement of the Account of WhalenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  5. Sage v. . WheelerNew York Court of Appeals · 1899

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Estate of HilliardNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API