Paisley v. Holzshu
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Allegany County, where the case was tried upon an agreed statement of facts. The trial Court ruled that upon the pleadings and evidence the plaintiff was not entitled to recover.
1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.
• This is an action of ejectment brought by the appellant against the appellee for an interest in a lot of ground in Cumberland. The appellant claims under a sheriff’s sale; and the appellee under a sale by trustees acting under the authority contained in a deed executed by James Gunning, who was seized of the fee-simple estate therein as hereinafter stated. The case was tried before the lower Court on an agreed statement of facts, without the aid of a jury.
The facts are substantially as follows : (i). On January 18th, 1883, Joseph M. Gunning confessed judgment in favor of Stevenson &…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- White v. . HowardNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Church Extension of the Methodist Episcopal Church v. Smith ex rel. GuerkeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1881
- Byrne v. GunningCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1891
- Reiff v. StriteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1880
- Van Vechten v. . KeatorNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Beaver v. RossSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- Stake v. MobleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1905
- Clifton v. OwensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- Coe v. HaysCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- West Virginia Pulp & Paper Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1909
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.