Legal Opinion · Dissent

Consumers Power Co. v. Public Service Commission

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1999No. Docket Nos. 111482, 111483, 111486, 111487 and 111719-111726, Calendar No. 11Published

1DissentBrickley, J.

The majority misinteiprets the statutory language relevant to this case and mistakenly characterizes retail wheeling as infringing the managerial prerogatives of the appellant utilities. For these reasons, I respectfully dissent.

i

At issue in this case is the Public Service Commission’s interpretation of the statutes in which the Legislature delegated authority to the psc to oversee electric utilities in Michigan. The majority “grant[s] no *169deference to the psc interpretation in this case because the plain meaning of the statutes are controlling.” Ante at 157, n 8, citing Union Carbide Corp v…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. ShimerSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. United States v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Mississippi Power & Light Co. v. Mississippi Ex Rel. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Magreta v. Ambassador Steel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1968

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API