Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Viger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 14, 1983PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Weiss, J.

This is an action for attorney malpractice resulting from defendants’ alleged negligence in representing plaintiff in an action for a declaratory judgment against plaintiff brought by one Robert S. Stewart concerning an issue of *593coverage under an automobile insurance policy. A default judgment in Stewart’s favor was affirmed by this court (Stewart v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 71 AD2d 705, adhered to on rearg 72 AD2d 978, mot for lv to app dsmd 48 NY2d 1014). Defendant Viger alleged that he employed Armstrong as an attorney to defend the Stewart action but…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Barasch v. MicucciNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Eaton v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. MATTER OF HODES v. AxelrodNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. In Re the Arbitration Between Board of Trustees & Maplewood Teachers' Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Stewart v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Klenk v. KentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. Boss v. Avoxe Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  3. Upright v. City of KingstonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  4. Kimball v. Continental Assurance Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  5. Brown Cow Farm, Inc. v. Volvo of America Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API