MISSISSIPPI TANK CO., INC. v. White
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Ebbri-iardt, Judge.
Headnote 1 requires no elaboration.
In the state of the record, jury questions on material issues were presented by the evidence and the motion for judgment n.o.v. must fail.
Inasmuch as the defendant’s evidence disclosed that one of the tanks plaintiff was notified to pick up had been used, thereby rendering the defendant liable for it even under his con tentions that there had been a mutual departure from the terms of the written contract, as set out in his amended answer, to the effect that the tanks consigned to the defendant were to be paid for by him “in the event the…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Barnum v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Williams v. SwintSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Simeonides v. ZervisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972