Legal Opinion

McNabb v. Yates

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 11, 2009No. 09-71089PublishedCited by 289 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Petitioner Ronnie McNabb seeks authorization to file a second or successive 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition in the district court. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b). The district court dismissed McNabb’s first section 2254 habeas corpus petition as time-barred under § 2244(d)(1) of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (“AEDPA”). We hold that the dismissal of a habeas petition as untimely constitutes a disposition on the merits and that a further petition challenging the same conviction would be “second or successive” for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b).

A habeas petition is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Gonzalez v. CrosbySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Woods v. CareyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  4. Kevin Murray v. Charles Greiner, Superintendent, Julio Cesar Arce v. Brian Fischer, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  5. Phelps v. AlameidaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by289 opinions

  1. In Re RainsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  2. Alexander Balbuena v. William SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  3. Willie Jones, Sr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
  4. Pizzuto v. BladesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  5. Griham v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2019

284 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API