McNabb v. Yates
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Petitioner Ronnie McNabb seeks authorization to file a second or successive 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition in the district court. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b). The district court dismissed McNabb’s first section 2254 habeas corpus petition as time-barred under § 2244(d)(1) of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (“AEDPA”). We hold that the dismissal of a habeas petition as untimely constitutes a disposition on the merits and that a further petition challenging the same conviction would be “second or successive” for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b).
A habeas petition is…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Gonzalez v. CrosbySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Woods v. CareyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Kevin Murray v. Charles Greiner, Superintendent, Julio Cesar Arce v. Brian Fischer, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Phelps v. AlameidaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by289 opinions
- In Re RainsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Alexander Balbuena v. William SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Willie Jones, Sr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- Pizzuto v. BladesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Griham v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2019
284 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.