Legal Opinion
Gianetti v. Teakwood, Ltd.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided April 17, 2020No. 19-1135Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
19-1135 Gianetti v. Teakwood, Ltd., et al. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT=S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION ASUMMARY ORDER@). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dorchester Financial Securities, Inc. v. Banco BRJ, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- Knipple v. Viking Communications, Ltd.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Bross Utilities Service Corp. v. AboubshaitDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1980
- Ryan v. CerulloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Doe I v. CiolliDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.