Legal Opinion

St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Phœnix Assurance Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 5, 1932PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The action is brought upon defendant’s written policy — not upon a claimed oral contract or a “ binder ” contract. The policy was not countersigned by the duly authorized agent at Niagara Falls until the day after the fire. Since the policy provides that it shall not be valid until thus countersigned no contract binding the defendant ever went into effect for the reason that the policy was neither made a complete contract nor delivered until after the fire. The delivery of the policy by defendant’s agent, the Niagara Falls Fire Office, cannot be held to have created a waiver by defendant of…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Taggert v. Security Insurance Co. of New HavenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API