Osteen v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1DissentTownsend, J.
From the second division of the opinion and the judgment affirming this case, I dissent. The first special ground of the amended motion for a new trial contends that the trial court erred in refusing to grant a mistrial on motion of defendant’s attorney on account of improper and prejudicial remarks made by the solicitor-general in his argument to the jury following the conclusion of the introduction of the evidence. The argument complained of is as follows: “I am going to prove what Bone told the officers out there in Mississippi about what transpired here in Macon.” According to this ground…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mitchum v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
- Wall v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Southern Railway Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Brooks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
- Lance v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.