Legal Opinion

M & M Parking Co. v. Industrial Commission

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1973No. 45456PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Underwood

The claimant, Mattie Hill, by her guardian, filed an application for adjustment of claim under the Workmen’s Compensation Act alleging that as the dependent aunt of Rossie Johnson she was entitled to an award of compensation on account of Johnson’s death, which resulted from a fall from an elevator on the premises of his employer, M & M Parking Company. Following a hearing before an arbitrator for the Commission, compensation was denied on the grounds that Johnson’s death did not arise out of and in the course of his employment. After hearing additional evidence on review, the Industrial…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Chmelik v. VanaIllinois Supreme Court · 1964
  2. De Hoyos v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Decatur Railway & Light Co. v. Industrial BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Hahnemann Hospital v. Industrial BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Vaught v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1972

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Caterpillar Tractor Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Paganelis v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  3. District 141, International Ass'n of MacHinists & Aerospace Workers v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Phelps v. Positive Action Tool Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Chicago Transit Authority v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1975

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API