Legal Opinion

Annette Cody v. P.C. Richard and Son Service Company, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California

Decided October 18, 2023No. 2:23-cv-03438Unknown

1Opinion

1 JS -6 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No. 2:23-cv-03438-SSS-KKx 11 ANNETTE CODY, 12 Plaintiff, 13 ORDER REMANDING CASE TO v. STATE COURT SUA SPONTE 14 15 P.C. RICHARD AND SON SERVICE COMPANY, INC., 16 17 Defendant. 18 On September 18, 2023, the Court issued an order to show cause as to 19 why the matter should not be remanded (the “OSC”). [Dkt. 31]. On September 20 29, 2023, Defendant P.C. Richard and Son Service Company, Inc., (“P.C. 21 Richard”) filed its response to the OSC [Dkt. 32], and Plaintiff Annette Cody 22 (“Cody”) filed…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Caterpillar Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Antonio Abrego Abrego v. The Dow Chemical Co Shell Oil Company, D/B/A Shell Chemical Company, and Shell Agricultural Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  4. Grant Fritsch v. Swift Transportation Co. of AzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  5. Grubbs v. General Electric Credit Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API