Legal Opinion

Stringer v. Zacheis

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 31, 1982No. 17363PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mills

Medical malpractice.

Dr. Zacheis was sued on negligence and res ipsa loquitur.

Summary judgment for defendant on both counts.

We affirm.

Plaintiff appealed from the granting of a summary judgment for defendant on both counts of his complaint of medical malpractice. Count I was grounded in negligence, count II asserted a res ipsa loquitur theory.

We affirm.

In medical malpractice cases, as in other cases, summary judgment is properly granted where there is no genuine issue as to any material fact. The court is to determine the existence or absence of a genuine issue as to any material facts from the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Walski v. TiesengaIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Spidle v. StewardIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Clark v. GibbonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Sanders v. FrostAppellate Court of Illinois · 1969
  5. Hill v. Lutheran HospitalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Taylor v. City of BeardstownAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  2. Hansen v. Ruby Construction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  3. Quality Lighting, Inc. v. BenjaminAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  4. Guebard v. JabaayAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  5. Seefeldt v. Millikin National Bank of DecaturAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API